As you may be able to tell from my latest commits we are fast heading
towards 3.1.0.1.
Now rolling a new snapshot for the updated Release Notes and ChangeLog.
Administrative stuff still needed:
* check and update ./configure setting release notes
* Better description (sect 4) on:
SslBump
eCAP
Loadable modules
.. .others?
* second opinion on sect 4 version renumbering description. Does my
description of the 3.1.* numbering match everyones understanding of it?
* Vote: should we old 3.1.0.1 for ntlm_auth helper rename?
* Vote: should we hold 3.1.0.1 for SourceLayout commits?
* Can anyone port the COSS stability stuff in time for 3.1 stable?
Or should we disable it now for 3.1 as done for 3.0?
* Are there any other possible blockers for 3.1.0.1 known?
Mark/Alex: what are the chances of a RFC2616 compliance scan shortly
after the package actually rolls?
And that I think is the whole of it. :-)
Amos
-- Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE4 or 3.0.STABLE9Received on Wed Oct 15 2008 - 10:15:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 20 2008 - 12:00:06 MDT