Hi Henrik,
At 23.42 05/10/2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>On sön, 2008-10-05 at 14:29 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> > The users who have needed to use it recently pretty much overrule
> > complete removal in 3.1.
> >
> > Does squid_smb_lm_auth cover everyones understanding of it?
>
>Like to keep the ntlm part if possible as it's a good indication of what
>auth_param class the helper may be used from, even if the helper as such
>only support lanman level subset of NTLMSSP.
Correct, but things are very confused here.
Currently we have four ntlm helpers:
fakeauth_auth
mswin_ntlm_auth
no_check.pl
ntlm_auth
So, now any kind of naming convention is missing ..... :-(
What about something like this ?
fake_ntlm_auth
mswin_ntlm_auth
no_check_ntlm_auth.pl
lm_ntlm_auth
Regards
Guido
-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio_at_acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Mon Oct 06 2008 - 09:57:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 06 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT