On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 07:37 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On tor, 2007-11-22 at 10:57 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> > Three cheers for Henrik! :-)
> >
> > Any chance of a 3.1 port soon?
>
> We need a bit of discussion on whats the best approach on how to solve
> Bug #7 first.
>
> I.e. should we do like I did for Squid-2, rewriting the entry, or should
> we jump directly to step 2 modifying the store interface allowing only
> the header to be rewritten.
>
> It's not very nice to rewrite the whole entry when it's a 6GB dvd
> image... puts quite some strain on the disk I/O...
I think "jumping directly to step 2" is the right thing to do for Squid3
after v3.0. Perhaps we should add this to the Squid3 feature wish list
on wiki?
Thank you,
Alex.
Received on Mon Nov 26 2007 - 09:33:31 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:00:05 MST