Re: Squid and SIGPIPE

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:32 +0800

On Sun, Jul 08, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 05, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >>I have been overlooking these for a while on the assumption that it was
> >>gdb catching something when it should have left it. I have just started
> >>wondering if this was in fact bad unexpected behaviour for the squid
> >>signals. Should I be looking into it?
> >
> >Nope!
> >
> >put this in ~/.gdbinit:
> >
> >handle all nostop noprint
> >handle SIGSEGV stop
> >handle SIGPIPE stop
> >
>
> Thanks for that Adrian. I have tested it in my config now.
> "handle SIGPIPE stop" did the opposite of what is wanted, "nostop print"
> lets me know when they occur, but leaves squid running. I assume it was
> a typos or version defaults difference?

Sorry *grin* handle SIGABRT stop instead of SIGPIPE..

adrian
Received on Sun Jul 08 2007 - 01:32:48 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Aug 01 2007 - 12:00:06 MDT