Re: Status on NTLM in Squid3?

On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 08:59, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 01:11, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> > One small request to make the future a little brighter. In Squid-3 we have
> > already started adding support for concurrency in the helper protocols by
> > prefixing each query with a query/session identifier (0 - max concurrency
> > level defined for the helper), and the helper is free to answer the
> > received queries in any order it likes. It would be great if you could
> > look into how well this can be supported by Samba ntlm_auth to allow the
> > scheme to scale in bigger installations.
>
> Can you give me details of the exact protocol you intend to use? Inside
> ntlm_auth it should be trivial, I just keep separate state machines in a
> lookup tree.

Actually, now I re-read this, I think know what you you mean:

0 YR ........
1 YR ......
1 TT #########
1 KK ......

Is there are 'shutdown' command?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet@samba.org
Authentication Developer, Samba Team            http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet@hawkerc.net