On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> Not that I've used :[. There was a linux distro with stack-protection in
> gcc IIRC.
Found two..
Immunix with the StackGuard extension
<url:http://www.immunix.com/>
Gento with the Stack Smashing Protector (similar to StackGuard)
<url:http://www.gentoo.org/>
<url:http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/>
Currently setting up a Gentoo development environment to try out the ssp
extension.
> I asked a gcc hacker I know and was pointed at 'mudflap' as
> 'promising'.
Indeed, mudflap looks VERY interesting, but somewhat hard to find
documentation on it seems. Finally I found some good documentation on the
GCC Summit 2003 proceedings and from what it looks this is a GCC
extension no C/C++ developer should be without.
It seems the Fedora Core 2 will include a mudflap enabled GCC and there is
already prebuild packages available. More information shortly (installed
and Squid compile running..)
> Possibly valgrind or another profiler could give you some detail too.
have not suceeded in trapping the error with valgrind yet, but it may
simply be a matter of time.
I will defenitely try the ssp and mudflap approaches immediately (pending
installation first..).
Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Jan 22 2004 - 04:47:01 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Jan 31 2004 - 12:00:10 MST