Re: MSInstallation for SquidNT

On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 19:33, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 September 2002 10.35, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > I think that any binary 'we' produce should be packaged with
> > free-as-in-speech tools. Last I heard there is no open source MSI
> > installer service - but there are plenty of open source
> > install-from-the-web programs.
>
> My opinion is that how Squid is packaged is up to the person making
> the distribution. I have no problem with someone using the MSI
> installer for packaging Squid as long as the MSI license allows for
> this..
>
> If there will be an official (as opposed to contributed) Squid for NT
> binary distribution distributed next to the official source then my
> view is somewhat different. Such binary should if possible be build
> with all free tools.

Yep, we are saying the same thing - but you are clearer :}. (Note my use
of 'we').

Rob