RE: licencing and modules

From: Chemolli Francesco (USI) <ChemolliF@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:37:33 +0200

> Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
>
> > IIRC Harvest was originally under a BSD license. How was it possible
> > to change that to a GPL for Squid then?
>
> Harvest was not BSD licensed (see "CREDITS"), but I am pretty
> sure Duane
> can provide details as it is he who made the transition from Harvest
> Cached to Squid GPL (both in person and source, I only witnessed the
> source transition and had email contact with Duane during the time).
>
> It is generally possible to go from BSD to GPL, but not the other way
> around.

Now that I think about it, you're right :-)

> Well, technically it is possible for the copyright
> holder to go
> from GPL to any license form, but only if great care has been taken in
> how contributions to the GPL code has been accepted (which is not the
> case in case of Squid).

"great care" usually means "all your copyright are belongs to us".
I'm quite happy such a care hasn't been used :-)

-- 
	/kinkie 
Received on Fri Apr 20 2001 - 03:33:16 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:47 MST